Coalitional Beliefs of Cournot Network Agents
Paraskevas V. Lekeas

TL;DR
This paper investigates how agents in network cooperative games form beliefs about the network to support cooperation, focusing on differentiated Cournot competition and stability of the network core.
Contribution
It characterizes the set of coalitional beliefs that ensure core non-emptiness and network stability in Cournot network agents.
Findings
Identifies beliefs supporting cooperation in network games
Characterizes conditions for core non-emptiness
Ensures network stability through belief structures
Abstract
In Network cooperative games, due to computational complexity issues, agents are not able to base their behavior on the "whole network status" but have to follow certain "beliefs" as to how it is in their strategic interest to act. This behavior constitutes the main interest of this paper. To this end, we quantify and characterize the set of beliefs that support cooperation of such agents. Assuming that they are engaged in a differentiated Cournot competition and that they equally split the worth produced, we characterize the set of coalitional beliefs that support core non-emptiness and thus guarantee stability of the Network.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Applications · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Economic theories and models
