Representations of posets: Linear versus Unitary
Vyacheslav Futorny, Yurii Samoilenko, Kostyantyn Yusenko

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationship between the representation theories of posets in linear and unitary spaces, revealing that results in the unitary case closely mirror those in the classical linear case.
Contribution
It provides insights into the connection between linear and unitary representations of posets, highlighting the similarities and differences in their theoretical frameworks.
Findings
Results in the unitary case are well-correlated with the linear case
The paper clarifies the phenomena linking the two representation theories
It sheds light on the generalization of classical linear theory to the unitary setting
Abstract
A number of recent papers treated the representation theory of partially ordered sets in unitary spaces with the so called orthoscalar relation. Such theory generalizes the classical theory which studies the representations of partially ordered sets in linear spaces. It happens that the results in the unitary case are well-correlated with those in the linear case. The purpose of this article is to shed light on this phenomena.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
