Herschel-ATLAS: VISTA VIKING near-IR counterparts in the Phase 1 GAMA 9h data
S. Fleuren, W. Sutherland, L. Dunne, D.J.B. Smith, S.J. Maddox, J., Gonz\'alez-Nuevo, J. Findlay, R. Auld, M. Baes, N.A. Bond, D.G. Bonfield, N., Bourne, A. Cooray, S. Buttiglione, A. Cava, A. Dariush, G. De Zotti, S.P., Driver, S. Dye, S. Eales, J. Fritz, M. L. P. Gunawardhana

TL;DR
This study identifies near-infrared counterparts to Herschel-ATLAS sub-mm sources using VISTA VIKING data, improving identification rates and estimating redshifts, with implications for understanding galaxy properties.
Contribution
It introduces a likelihood ratio method for near-infrared counterpart identification and demonstrates improved matching efficiency over optical data alone.
Findings
Over 51% of SPIRE sources have reliable VIKING counterparts.
The false identification rate is estimated at 4.2%.
Photometric redshifts have a median of 0.405.
Abstract
We identify near-infrared Ks band counterparts to Herschel-ATLAS sub-mm sources, using a preliminary object catalogue from the VISTA VIKING survey. The sub-mm sources are selected from the H-ATLAS Phase 1 catalogue of the GAMA 9h field, which includes all objects detected at 250, 350 or 500 um with the SPIRE instrument. We apply and discuss a likelihood ratio (LR) method for VIKING candidates within a search radius of 10" of the 22,000 SPIRE sources with a 5 sigma detection at 250 um. We find that 11,294(51%) of the SPIRE sources have a best VIKING counterpart with a reliability , and the false identification rate of these is estimated to be 4.2%. We expect to miss ~5% of true VIKING counterparts. There is evidence from Z-J and J-Ks colours that the reliable counterparts to SPIRE galaxies are marginally redder than the field population. We obtain photometric redshifts for ~68%…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
