Is there any coherent measure for eternal inflation?
Ken D. Olum

TL;DR
This paper examines the challenge of defining a coherent measure for probabilities in eternal inflation, demonstrating that no measure satisfying certain axioms can be consistently formulated, highlighting unresolved foundational issues.
Contribution
The paper introduces axioms for measures in eternal inflation and proves the non-existence of such measures within a simple toy model, emphasizing fundamental limitations.
Findings
No measure obeying the axioms exists in the toy model
Some measures satisfy the axioms but are otherwise unacceptable
The problem of defining probabilities in eternal inflation remains unsolved
Abstract
An eternally inflating universe produces an infinite amount of spatial volume, so every possible event happens an infinite number of times, and it is impossible to define probabilities in terms of frequencies. This problem is usually addressed by means of a measure, which regulates the infinities and produces meaningful predictions. I argue that any measure should obey certain general axioms, but then give a simple toy model in which one can prove that no measure obeying the axioms exists. In certain cases of eternal inflation there are measures that obey the axioms, but all such measures appear to be unacceptable for other reasons. Thus the problem of defining sensible probabilities in eternal inflation seems not be solved.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
