A Pseudoline Counterexample to the Strong Dirac Conjecture
Ben D. Lund, George B. Purdy, Justin W. Smith

TL;DR
This paper constructs an infinite family of pseudoline arrangements that disprove the Strong Dirac Conjecture by showing no pseudoline is incident to more than 4n/9 intersection points, highlighting differences from line arrangements.
Contribution
It provides a counterexample to the Strong Dirac Conjecture for pseudolines and explores the structural differences in incidences between points and pseudolines versus lines.
Findings
Counterexample disproves the Strong Dirac Conjecture for pseudolines
Shows pseudoline arrangements can have limited incidences per pseudoline
Raises open problems on incidence structures in pseudoline arrangements
Abstract
We demonstrate an infinite family of pseudoline arrangements, in which an arrangement of n pseudolines has no member incident to more than 4n/9 points of intersection. This shows the "Strong Dirac" conjecture to be false for pseudolines. We also raise a number of open problems relating to possible differences between the structure of incidences between points and lines versus the structure of incidences between points and pseudolines.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
