A uniform asteroseismic analysis of 22 solar-type stars observed by Kepler
S. Mathur, T. S. Metcalfe, M. Woitaszek, H. Bruntt, G. A. Verner, J., Christensen-Dalsgaard, O. L. Creevey, G. Dogan, S. Basu, C. Karoff, D., Stello, T. Appourchaux, T. L. Campante, W. J. Chaplin, R. A. Garcia, T. R., Bedding, O. Benomar, A. Bonanno, S. Deheuvels, Y. Elsworth

TL;DR
This study performs a uniform asteroseismic analysis of 22 bright solar-type stars observed by Kepler, demonstrating high-precision determinations of stellar properties and comparing different modeling approaches.
Contribution
It provides a systematic comparison of methods for deriving stellar parameters from asteroseismic data, highlighting the accuracy and consistency of individual frequency fitting.
Findings
Asteroseismic radii and masses are determined to ~1% precision.
Ages are estimated with ~2.5% precision.
Different modeling approaches show good agreement, with minor systematic differences.
Abstract
Asteroseismology with the Kepler space telescope is providing not only an improved characterization of exoplanets and their host stars, but also a new window on stellar structure and evolution for the large sample of solar-type stars in the field. We perform a uniform analysis of 22 of the brightest asteroseismic targets with the highest signal-to-noise ratio observed for 1 month each during the first year of the mission, and we quantify the precision and relative accuracy of asteroseismic determinations of the stellar radius, mass, and age that are possible using various methods. We present the properties of each star in the sample derived from an automated analysis of the individual oscillation frequencies and other observational constraints using the Asteroseismic Modeling Portal (AMP), and we compare them to the results of model-grid-based methods that fit the global oscillation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
