
TL;DR
This paper reviews NSF-funded optical astronomy assets in the US to identify optimal funding strategies for the upcoming decade, emphasizing cost-effective progress amid fixed funding constraints.
Contribution
It provides an analysis of current assets and suggests priorities for optical astronomy to maximize scientific progress within limited funding.
Findings
Optical astronomy offers the highest potential for progress this decade.
Many aspirations of Astro2010 cannot be met under current funding levels.
Prioritizing optical astronomy assets can optimize scientific returns.
Abstract
In the United States, the National Science Foundation (NSF), anticipating the no growth in funding, has commissioned a review of NSF-funded astronomy assets with the goal of determining how to best allocate funding for this decade. Inputs from members of the US community were sought. It is a matter of simple arithmetic that for a fixed level of funding many significant aspirations of Astro2010 cannot be met. Here, accepting the boundary conditions posed above, I have focused on fields centered on optical astronomy which offer the best opportunity for progress in this decade and thus offer the highest cost-benefit ratio. Readers may profit from reading the first seven sections.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHistory and Developments in Astronomy · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research · Science, Research, and Medicine
