Conformal frames and the validity of Birkhoff's theorem
Salvatore Capozziello, Diego S\'aez-G\'omez

TL;DR
This paper investigates the validity of Birkhoff's theorem within scalar-tensor theories of gravity, comparing Einstein and Jordan frames, and questions their physical equivalence in perturbative regimes.
Contribution
It provides a perturbative analysis of Birkhoff's theorem in scalar-tensor theories and examines the differences between Einstein and Jordan frames.
Findings
Birkhoff's theorem does not generally hold in scalar-tensor theories.
The Einstein and Jordan frames show differences in perturbative validity.
Results challenge the physical equivalence of the two frames in perturbations.
Abstract
Birkhoff's theorem is one of the most important statements of Einstein's general relativity, which generally can not be extended to modified theories of gravity. Here we study the validity of the theorem in scalar-tensor theories using a perturbative approach, and compare the results in the so-called Einstein and Jordan frames. The implications of the results question the physical equivalence between both frames, at least in perturbations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
