Universally Kuratowski-Ulam spaces and open-open games
Piotr Kalemba, Andrzej Kucharski

TL;DR
This paper investigates the properties of spaces where the second player can win the open-open game, revealing they are not universally Kuratowski-Ulam, and compares two game variants, G and G7, showing they are not equivalent.
Contribution
It demonstrates that spaces with a winning second player in the open-open game are not universally Kuratowski-Ulam and clarifies the non-equivalence of two game variants G and G7.
Findings
Spaces with a winning second player are not universally Kuratowski-Ulam
Games G and G7 are not equivalent
Provides insights into the structure of open-open games
Abstract
We examine the class of spaces in which the second player has a winning strategy in the open--open game. We show that this spaces are not universally Kuratowski-Ulam. We also show that the games G and G7 introduced by P. Daniels, K. Kunen, H. Zhou [Fund. Math. 145 (1994), no. 3, 205--220] are not equivalent.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
