Measure and Probability in Cosmology
Joshua S. Schiffrin, Robert M. Wald

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the use of the Hamiltonian measure in general relativity for assigning probabilities to cosmological scenarios, highlighting fundamental difficulties and limitations in its application.
Contribution
It identifies four major conceptual and technical challenges that undermine the use of the Hamiltonian measure for probability estimates in cosmology.
Findings
The measure does not equilibrate on cosmological scales.
Probability calculations depend heavily on how infinities are regulated.
Inhomogeneous degrees of freedom complicate the measure.
Abstract
General relativity has a Hamiltonian formulation, which formally provides a canonical (Liouville) measure on the space of solutions. In ordinary statistical physics, the Liouville measure is used to compute probabilities of macrostates, and it would seem natural to use the similar measure arising in general relativity to compute probabilities in cosmology, such as the probability that the universe underwent an era of inflation. Indeed, a number of authors have used the restriction of this measure to the space of homogeneous and isotropic universes with scalar field matter (minisuperspace)---namely, the Gibbons-Hawking-Stewart measure---to make arguments about the likelihood of inflation. We argue here that there are at least four major difficulties with using the measure of general relativity to make probability arguments in cosmology: (1) Equilibration does not occur on cosmological…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Relativity and Gravitational Theory · Statistical Mechanics and Entropy
