The Taiwan ECDFS Near-Infrared Survey: Very Bright End of the Luminosity Function at z>7
Bau-Ching Hsieh (1), Wei-Hao Wang (1), Haojing Yan (2), Lihwai Lin, (1), Hiroshi Karoji (3, 4), Jeremy Lim (1, 5), Paul T. P. Ho (1, 6),, Chao-Wei Tsai (7) ((1) Institute of Astrophysics, Astronomy, Academia, Sinica (ASIAA), (2) Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of

TL;DR
The paper reports on a deep near-infrared survey in the ECDFS field, identifying a rare galaxy candidate at z>7 that challenges existing models of early galaxy formation.
Contribution
It introduces new color selection criteria and a deconvolution method for IRAC flux measurement, leading to the identification of a luminous high-z galaxy candidate.
Findings
Only one z>7 candidate found, TENIS-ZD1.
TENIS-ZD1 is a young starburst galaxy with a stellar mass of 3.2×10^10 M_sun.
The candidate challenges current galaxy formation models.
Abstract
The primary goal of the Taiwan ECDFS Near-Infrared Survey (TENIS) is to find well screened galaxy candidates at z>7 (z' dropout) in the Extended Chandra Deep Field-South (ECDFS). To this end, TENIS provides relatively deep J and Ks data (~25.3 ABmag, 5-sigma) for an area of 0.5*0.5 degree. Leveraged with existing data at mid-infrared to optical wavelengths, this allows us to screen for the most luminous high-z objects, which are rare and thus require a survey over a large field to be found. We introduce new color selection criteria to select a z>7 sample with minimal contaminations from low-z galaxies and Galactic cool stars; to reduce confusion in the relatively low angular resolution IRAC images, we introduce a novel deconvolution method to measure the IRAC fluxes of individual sources. Illustrating perhaps the effectiveness at which we screen out interlopers, we find only one z>7…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
