Weak charge form factor and radius of 208Pb through parity violation in electron scattering
C. J. Horowitz, Z. Ahmed, C.-M. Jen, A. Rakhman, P. A. Souder, M. M., Dalton, N. Liyanage, K. D. Paschke, K. Saenboonruang, R. Silwal, G. B., Franklin, M. Friend, B. Quinn, K. S. Kumar, J.M. Mammei, D. McNulty, L., Mercado, S. Riordan, J. Wexler, R. W. Michaels, G. M. Urciuoli

TL;DR
This paper extracts the weak charge form factor, radius, and neutron skin thickness of 208Pb using parity-violating electron scattering data, revealing a weak charge skin and providing precise nuclear structure measurements.
Contribution
It introduces a method to determine the weak charge form factor and radius of 208Pb from PREX data, including uncertainties from models and strange quark contributions.
Findings
Weak charge radius R_W=5.826 ± 0.181 fm
Neutron radius R_n=5.751 ± 0.175 fm
Neutron skin thickness R_n - R_p=0.302 ± 0.175 fm
Abstract
We use distorted wave electron scattering calculations to extract the weak charge form factor F_W(q), the weak charge radius R_W, and the point neutron radius R_n, of 208Pb from the PREX parity violating asymmetry measurement. The form factor is the Fourier transform of the weak charge density at the average momentum transfer q=0.475 fm. We find F_W(q) =0.204 \pm 0.028 (exp) \pm 0.001 (model). We use the Helm model to infer the weak radius from F_W(q). We find R_W= 5.826 \pm 0.181 (exp) \pm 0.027 (model) fm. Here the exp error includes PREX statistical and systematic errors, while the model error describes the uncertainty in R_W from uncertainties in the surface thickness \sigma of the weak charge density. The weak radius is larger than the charge radius, implying a "weak charge skin" where the surface region is relatively enriched in weak charges compared to (electromagnetic)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
