Prototype effective-one-body model for nonprecessing spinning inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms
Andrea Taracchini, Yi Pan, Alessandra Buonanno, Enrico Barausse,, Michael Boyle, Tony Chu, Geoffrey Lovelace, Harald P. Pfeiffer, Mark A., Scheel

TL;DR
This paper develops a prototype effective-one-body model for nonprecessing spinning black-hole binaries, calibrated with numerical relativity data, capable of generating accurate inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms across a wide parameter space for gravitational wave detection.
Contribution
The paper introduces a new prototype EOB model for nonprecessing spinning black-hole binaries, combining calibration with numerical relativity and Teukolsky equation results, extending waveform generation capabilities.
Findings
Mismatch below 0.003 for total mass 20-200 M_
Model accurately reproduces waveforms for spins up to 0.7
Identifies improvements needed for high-spin cases
Abstract
We first use five non-spinning and two mildly spinning (chi_i \simeq -0.44, +0.44) numerical-relativity waveforms of black-hole binaries and calibrate an effective-one-body (EOB) model for non-precessing spinning binaries, notably its dynamics and the dominant (2,2) gravitational-wave mode. Then, we combine the above results with recent outcomes of small-mass-ratio simulations produced by the Teukolsky equation and build a prototype EOB model for detection purposes, which is capable of generating inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms for non-precessing spinning black-hole binaries with any mass ratio and individual black-hole spins -1 \leq chi_i \lesssim 0.7. We compare the prototype EOB model to two equal-mass highly spinning numerical-relativity waveforms of black holes with spins chi_i = -0.95, +0.97, which were not available at the time the EOB model was calibrated. In the case of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
