A measurement of gravitational lensing of the microwave background using South Pole Telescope data
A. van Engelen, R. Keisler, O. Zahn, K. A. Aird, B. A. Benson, L. E., Bleem, J. E. Carlstrom, C. L. Chang, H. M. Cho, T. M. Crawford, A. T. Crites,, T. de Haan, M. A. Dobbs, J. Dudley, E. M. George, N. W. Halverson, G. P., Holder, W. L. Holzapfel, S. Hoover, Z. Hou, J. D. Hrubes

TL;DR
This study uses South Pole Telescope data to detect and analyze gravitational lensing effects on the cosmic microwave background, providing improved cosmological parameter constraints consistent with LCDM predictions.
Contribution
First measurement of CMB lensing using South Pole Telescope data, including detailed bias analysis and combined cosmological constraints.
Findings
Lensing amplitude ratio 0.86 +/- 0.16, no lensing disfavored at 6.3 sigma
Measured A_lens=0.90+/-0.19 consistent with LCDM
Improved constraints on Omega_k, sigma_8, and w when combined with WMAP7
Abstract
We use South Pole Telescope data from 2008 and 2009 to detect the non-Gaussian signature in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) produced by gravitational lensing and to measure the power spectrum of the projected gravitational potential. We constrain the ratio of the measured amplitude of the lensing signal to that expected in a fiducial LCDM cosmological model to be 0.86 +/- 0.16, with no lensing disfavored at 6.3 sigma. Marginalizing over LCDM cosmological models allowed by the WMAP7 results in a measurement of A_lens=0.90+/-0.19, indicating that the amplitude of matter fluctuations over the redshift range 0.5 <~ z <~ 5 probed by CMB lensing is in good agreement with predictions. We present the results of several consistency checks. These include a clear detection of the lensing signature in CMB maps filtered to have no overlap in Fourier space, as well as a "curl" diagnostic that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
