A planetary system around the nearby M dwarf GJ 667C with at least one super-Earth in its habitable zone
Guillem Anglada-Escud\'e, Pamela Arriagada, Steven S. Vogt, Eugenio J., Rivera, R. Paul Butler, Jeffrey D. Crane, Stephen A. Shectman, Ian B., Thompson, Dante Minniti, Nader Haghighipour, Brad D. Carter, C. G. Tinney,, Robert A. Wittenmyer, Jeremy A. Bailey, Simon J. O'Toole

TL;DR
This study re-analyzed four years of spectra of the nearby M dwarf GJ 667C, revealing multiple planetary signals including a super-Earth in the habitable zone, and demonstrating the potential ubiquity of such worlds around metal-poor stars.
Contribution
Introduces a new data analysis technique for radial velocity measurements and reports the detection of a super-Earth in the habitable zone of GJ 667C, a metal-poor star in a triple system.
Findings
Detection of a super-Earth candidate within the habitable zone.
Identification of additional planetary signals and a long-term trend suggestive of a gas giant.
Supports the idea that habitable super-Earths are common around metal-poor M dwarfs.
Abstract
We re-analyze 4 years of HARPS spectra of the nearby M1.5 dwarf GJ 667C available through the ESO public archive. The new radial velocity (RV) measurements were obtained using a new data analysis technique that derives the Doppler measurement and other instrumental effects using a least-squares approach. Combining these new 143 measurements with 41 additional RVs from the Magellan/PFS and Keck/HIRES spectrometers, reveals 3 additional signals beyond the previously reported 7.2-day candidate, with periods of 28 days, 75 days, and a secular trend consistent with the presence of a gas giant (Period sim 10 years). The 28-day signal implies a planet candidate with a minimum mass of 4.5 Mearth orbiting well within the canonical definition of the star's liquid water habitable zone, this is, the region around the star at which an Earth-like planet could sustain liquid water on its surface.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
