Theory of High-Tc Superconductivity: Transition Temperature
Dale R. Harshman (1, 2, 3), Anthony T. Fiory (4), John D. Dow, (3,5) ((1) Physikon Research Corporation, (2) University of Notre Dame, (3), Arizona State University, (4) New Jersey Institute of Technology, (5), Institute for Postdoctoral Studies)

TL;DR
This paper presents a universal relationship linking the transition temperature of high-Tc superconductors to their layered structure, charge spacing, and Coulomb interactions, providing a predictive framework for optimal Tc.
Contribution
It introduces a universal formula for Tc0 based on structural and electronic parameters, validated across 31 diverse high-Tc materials.
Findings
Universal relationship for optimal Tc: kBTc0 = β/ℓζ
Optimal Tc determined within ±1.4 K accuracy
Non-optimal compounds show reduced Tc and sample degradation
Abstract
It is demonstrated that the transition temperature (Tc) of high-Tc superconductors is determined by their layered crystal structure, bond lengths, valency properties of the ions, and Coulomb coupling between electronic bands in adjacent, spatially separated layers. Analysis of 31 high-Tc materials (cuprates, ruthenates, rutheno-cuprates, iron pnictides, organics) yields the universal relationship for optimal compounds, kBTc0 = {\beta}/\ell{\zeta}, where \ell is related to the mean spacing between interacting charges in the layers, {\zeta} is the distance between interacting electronic layers, {\beta} is a universal constant and Tc0 is the optimal transition temperature (determined to within an uncertainty of +/- 1.4 K by this relationship). Non-optimum compounds, in which sample degradation is evident, e.g. by broadened superconducting transitions and diminished Meissner fractions,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
