Dithering Strategies and Point-Source Photometry

TL;DR

This paper investigates how different dithering strategies affect the accuracy of point-source photometry, revealing that dithering impacts position accuracy significantly and flux uncertainty slightly, especially with large pixels.

Contribution

It provides a detailed analysis of the ensemble behavior of photometric and positional uncertainties under various dithering patterns, highlighting non-Gaussian distributions and optimal strategies.

Findings

Position accuracy is highly sensitive to dithering patterns.

Flux uncertainty varies slightly with dithering strategy.

Fractional pixel dithering can be optimal if pointing accuracy is better than 0.15 pixel.

Abstract

The accuracy in the photometry of a point source depends on the point-spread function (PSF), detector pixelization, and observing strategy. The PSF and pixel response describe the spatial blurring of the source, the pixel scale describes the spatial sampling of a single exposure, and the observing strategy determines the set of dithered exposures with pointing offsets from which the source flux is inferred. In a wide-field imaging survey, sources of interest are randomly distributed within the field of view and hence are centered randomly within a pixel. A given hardware configuration and observing strategy therefore have a distribution of photometric uncertainty for sources of fixed flux that fall in the field. In this article we explore the ensemble behavior of photometric and position accuracies for different PSFs, pixel scales, and dithering patterns. We find that the average uncertainty in the flux determination depends slightly on dither strategy, whereas the position determination can be strongly dependent on the dithering. For cases with pixels much larger than the PSF, the uncertainty distributions can be non-Gaussian, with rms values that are particularly sensitive to the dither strategy. We also find that for these configurations with large pixels, pointings dithered by a fractional pixel amount do not always give minimal average uncertainties; this is in contrast to image reconstruction for which fractional dithers are optimal. When fractional pixel dithering is favored, a pointing accuracy of better than $\sim 0.15$ pixel width is required to maintain half the advantage over random dithers.