Length 3 Edge-Disjoint Paths and Partial Orientation
Hannah Alpert, Jennifer Iglesias

TL;DR
This paper proves that finding k edge-disjoint paths of length exactly 3 between two vertices is NP-hard, correcting a previous claim of polynomial solvability, by reducing from the NP-hard Partial Orientation problem.
Contribution
It establishes the NP-hardness of the length-3 edge-disjoint paths problem, clarifying the computational complexity and correcting earlier misconceptions.
Findings
Proves the problem is NP-hard even without multiple edges
Reduces from the NP-hard Partial Orientation problem
Clarifies the computational complexity of length-3 edge-disjoint paths
Abstract
In 2003, it was claimed that the following problem was solvable in polynomial time: do there exist k edge-disjoint paths of length exactly 3 between vertices s and t in a given graph? The proof was flawed, and we show that this problem is NP-hard even if we disallow multiple edges. We use a reduction from Partial Orientation, a problem recently shown by P\'alv\"olgyi to be NP-hard.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Advanced Graph Theory Research · Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems
