The limiting distribution for the number of symbol comparisons used by QuickSort is nondegenerate (extended abstract)
Patrick Bindjeme, James Allen Fill

TL;DR
This paper proves that the limiting distribution of the scaled number of symbol comparisons in QuickSort is nondegenerate, addressing a previously unresolved question about its nature.
Contribution
It establishes the nondegeneracy of the limiting distribution for the number of symbol comparisons in QuickSort, extending prior results.
Findings
The limiting distribution is nondegenerate.
The proof involves complex probabilistic analysis.
Addresses a gap in understanding QuickSort's behavior.
Abstract
In a continuous-time setting, Fill (2010) proved, for a large class of probabilistic sources, that the number of symbol comparisons used by QuickSort, when centered by subtracting the mean and scaled by dividing by time, has a limiting distribution, but proved little about that limiting random variable Y -- not even that it is nondegenerate. We establish the nondegeneracy of Y. The proof is perhaps surprisingly difficult.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
