The effect of systematics on polarized spectral indices
Ingunn Kathrine Wehus, Unni Fuskeland, Hans Kristian Eriksen

TL;DR
This study investigates how systematics affect the estimation of polarized spectral indices in bright compact objects using WMAP data, revealing that spectral index estimates are sensitive to polarization angles and may be unreliable at certain scales.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that spectral index estimation from WMAP polarization data is significantly affected by systematics, especially detector polarization angles, highlighting potential calibration concerns.
Findings
Spectral index varies with polarization angle in WMAP data.
Spectral index estimates are unreliable at 1-degree scales.
Simple models can reproduce observed spectral index variations.
Abstract
We study four particularly bright polarized compact objects (Tau A, Virgo A, 3C273 and Fornax A) in the 7-year WMAP sky maps, with the goal of understanding potential systematics involved in estimation of foreground spectral indices. We estimate the spectral index, the polarization angle, the polarization fraction and apparent size and shape of these objects when smoothed to a nominal resolution of 1 degree FWHM. Second, we compute the spectral index as a function of polarization orientation, alpha. Because these objects are approximately point sources with constant polarization angle, this function should be constant in the absence of systematics. However, computing it for the K- and Ka-band WMAP data we find strong index variations for all four sources. For Tau A, we find a spectral index beta=-2.59+-0.03 for alpha=30 degrees, and beta=-2.03+-0.01 for alpha=50 degrees. On the other…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
