Asteroseismology of the solar analogs 16 Cyg A & B from Kepler observations
T. S. Metcalfe, W. J. Chaplin, T. Appourchaux, R. A. Garcia, S. Basu,, I. Brandao, O. L. Creevey, S. Deheuvels, G. Dogan, P. Eggenberger, C. Karoff,, A. Miglio, D. Stello, M. Yildiz, Z. Celik, H. M. Antia, O. Benomar, R. Howe,, C. Regulo, D. Salabert, T. Stahn, T. R. Bedding

TL;DR
This study uses Kepler data to analyze the oscillation frequencies of the solar analogs 16 Cyg A & B, deriving their stellar properties and confirming the reliability of asteroseismic methods.
Contribution
It provides detailed asteroseismic modeling of 16 Cyg A & B, including detection of octupole modes and independent stellar property estimation, with systematic uncertainty evaluation.
Findings
Derived a common age of 6.8 Gyr for both stars.
Detected octupole (l=3) oscillation modes in both stars.
Confirmed the reliability of asteroseismic modeling for binary systems.
Abstract
The evolved solar-type stars 16 Cyg A & B have long been studied as solar analogs, yielding a glimpse into the future of our own Sun. The orbital period of the binary system is too long to provide meaningful dynamical constraints on the stellar properties, but asteroseismology can help because the stars are among the brightest in the Kepler field. We present an analysis of three months of nearly uninterrupted photometry of 16 Cyg A & B from the Kepler space telescope. We extract a total of 46 and 41 oscillation frequencies for the two components respectively, including a clear detection of octupole (l=3) modes in both stars. We derive the properties of each star independently using the Asteroseismic Modeling Portal, fitting the individual oscillation frequencies and other observational constraints simultaneously. We evaluate the systematic uncertainties from an ensemble of results…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
