The thermodynamic cost of fast thought

TL;DR

This paper explores the thermodynamic costs of fast, intuitive thought (system 1) versus reasoning (system 2), demonstrating that system 1's computational nature incurs similar energy costs to binary machines when reasoning is inactive.

Contribution

It introduces a thermodynamic analysis of cognitive systems, linking information theory to psychological processes and validating the computational nature of intuitive thought.

Findings

System 1's energy cost matches that of binary machines when reasoning is disabled.

The study mathematically proves the computational attribute of intuitive thought.

Links thermodynamics and information theory to psychological models of cognition.

Abstract

After more than sixty years, Shannon's research [1-3] continues to raise fundamental questions, such as the one formulated by Luce [4,5], which is still unanswered: "Why is information theory not very applicable to psychological problems, despite apparent similarities of concepts?" On this topic, Pinker [6], one of the foremost defenders of the computational theory of mind [6], has argued that thought is simply a type of computation, and that the gap between human cognition and computational models may be illusory. In this context, in his latest book, titled Thinking Fast and Slow [8], Kahneman [7,8] provides further theoretical interpretation by differentiating the two assumed systems of the cognitive functioning of the human mind. He calls them intuition (system 1) determined to be an associative (automatic, fast and perceptual) machine, and reasoning (system 2) required to be voluntary and to operate logical- deductively. In this paper, we propose an ansatz inspired by Ausubel's learning theory for investigating, from the constructivist perspective [9-12], information processing in the working memory of cognizers. Specifically, a thought experiment is performed utilizing the mind of a dual-natured creature known as Maxwell's demon: a tiny "man-machine" solely equipped with the characteristics of system 1, which prevents it from reasoning. The calculation presented here shows that [...]. This result indicates that when the system 2 is shut down, both an intelligent being, as well as a binary machine, incur the same energy cost per unit of information processed, which mathematically proves the computational attribute of the system 1, as Kahneman [7,8] theorized. This finding links information theory to human psychological features and opens a new path toward the conception of a multi-bit reasoning machine.