Unfinished History and Paradoxes of Quantum Potential. II. Relativistic Point of View
E. A. Tagirov (Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia)

TL;DR
This paper investigates the origin of quantum potential in relativistic quantum field theory and compares it with non-relativistic quantum mechanics, revealing a deep connection to non-minimal coupling and highlighting discrepancies between approaches.
Contribution
It demonstrates the relationship between quantum potential and non-minimal scalar field coupling, and compares relativistic QFT derivations with traditional quantization methods.
Findings
Quantum potential relates to non-minimal coupling constant =1/6.
In static space-times, Hamiltonians from QFT and natural systems coincide at the origin.
Discrepancies exist between QFT-derived QP and coordinate-dependent PQs in non-relativistic quantum mechanics.
Abstract
This is the second of the two related papers analysing origins and possible explanations of a paradoxical phenomenon of the quantum potential (QP). It arises in quantum mechanics'(QM) of a particle in the Riemannian -dimensional configurational space obtained by various procedures of quantization of the non-relativistic natural Hamilton systems. Now, the two questions are investigated: 1)Does QP appear in the non-relativistic QM generated by the quantum theory of scalar field (QFT) non-minimally coupled to the space-time metric? 2)To which extent is it in accord with quantization of the natural systems? To this end, the asymptotic non-relativistic equation for the particle-interpretable wave functions and operators of canonical observables are obtained from the primary QFT objects. It is shown that, in the globally-static space-time, the Hamilton operators coincide at the origin of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
