X-Rays from Supernova Shocks in Dense Mass Loss

TL;DR

This paper investigates X-ray emissions from supernova shocks interacting with dense circumstellar media, analyzing how cooling processes and optical depths influence X-ray visibility and ionization of the surrounding gas.

Contribution

It provides a detailed theoretical framework for understanding X-ray production and absorption in supernova shocks within dense winds, explaining observed low X-ray fluxes.

Findings

Inverse Compton cooling dominates at high densities and velocities.

Optical depth effects significantly reduce observable X-ray flux.

Complete photoionization of the preshock gas is unlikely due to cooling and absorption.

Abstract

Type IIn and related supernovae show evidence for an interaction with a dense circumstellar medium that produces most of the supernova luminosity. X-ray emission from shock heated gas is crucial for the energetics of the interaction and can provide diagnostics on the shock interaction. Provided that the shock is at an optical depth tau_w\la c/v_s in the wind, where c is the speed of light and v_s is the shock velocity, a viscous shock is expected that heats the gas to a high temperature. For tau_w\ga 1, the shock wave is in the cooling regime; inverse Compton cooling dominates bremsstrahlung at higher densities and shock velocities. Although tau_w\ga 1, the optical depth through the emission zone is \la 1 so that inverse Compton effects do not give rise to significant X-ray emission. The electrons may not reach energy equipartition with the protons at higher shock velocities. As X-rays move out through the cool wind, the higher energy photons are lost to Compton degradation. If bremsstrahlung dominates the cooling and Compton losses are small, the energetic radiation can completely photoionize the preshock gas. However, inverse Compton cooling in the hot region and Compton degradation in the wind reduce the ionizing flux, so that complete photoionization is not obtained and photoabsorption by the wind further reduces the escaping X-ray flux. We conjecture that the combination of these effects led to the low observed X-ray flux from the optically luminous SN 2006gy.