On Naturalness of the MSSM and NMSSM
Zhaofeng Kang, Jinmian Li, Tianjun Li

TL;DR
This paper assesses the naturalness of the MSSM and NMSSM models, finding that the NMSSM is more favored given the Higgs mass and experimental constraints, with implications for fine-tuning and dark matter viability.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of naturalness in MSSM and NMSSM considering LHC data, Higgs mass scenarios, and dark matter constraints, highlighting the NMSSM's advantages.
Findings
Naturalness degree less than 2.5% with light stops and gluino constraints.
NMSSM more naturally accommodates the 125 GeV Higgs mass.
Lightest supersymmetric particle disfavored as dark matter by XENON100.
Abstract
With a bottom-up approach, we consider naturalness in the MSSM and NMSSM. Assuming the light stops, the LHC gluino search implies that the degree of fine tuning in both models is less than 2.5%. Taking the LHC hints for the SM-like Higgs boson mass m_h\sim125 GeV seriously, we find that naturalness will favor the NMSSM. We study the Higgs boson mass for several scenarios in the NMSSM: (1) A large \lambda and the doublet-singlet Higgs boson mixing effect pushing upward or pulling downward m_h. The former case can readily give the di-photon excess of the Higgs boson decay whereas the latter case can not. However, we point out that the former case has a new large fine-tuning related to strong \lambda-RGE running effect and vacuum stability. (2) A small \lambda and the mixing effect pushing m_h upward. Naturalness status becomes worse and no significant di-photon excess can be obtained. In…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
