Variability Selected Low-Luminosity Active Galactic Nuclei in the 4 Ms Chandra Deep Field-South
M. Young, W. N. Brandt, Y. Q. Xue, M. Paolillo, D. M. Alexander, F. E., Bauer, B. D. Lehmer, B. Luo, O. Shemmer, D. P. Schneider, C. Vignali

TL;DR
This study identifies low-luminosity active galactic nuclei (LLAGN) in deep X-ray surveys through long-term variability analysis, revealing their distinct black hole properties and accretion rates compared to luminous AGN.
Contribution
It demonstrates that variability can uncover LLAGN missed by traditional methods and models their variability-luminosity relation considering black hole mass and accretion rate.
Findings
20 out of 92 galaxies show variability indicative of LLAGN.
Variable LLAGN have lower black hole masses and accretion rates than luminous AGN.
A broken power-law PSD model roughly reproduces variability trends.
Abstract
The 4 Ms Chandra Deep Field-South (CDF-S) and other deep X-ray surveys have been highly effective at selecting active galactic nuclei (AGN). However, cosmologically distant low-luminosity AGN (LLAGN) have remained a challenge to identify due to significant contribution from the host galaxy. We identify long-term X-ray variability (~month-years, observed frame) in 20 of 92 CDF-S galaxies spanning redshifts z~0.08-1.02 that do not meet other AGN selection criteria. We show that the observed variability cannot be explained by X-ray binary populations or ultraluminous X-ray sources, so the variability is most likely caused by accretion onto a supermassive black hole. The variable galaxies are not heavily obscured in general, with a stacked effective power-law photon index of Gamma_stack~1.93+/-0.13, and are therefore likely LLAGN. The LLAGN tend to lie a factor of ~6-80 below the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
