Constraining fundamental constant evolution with HI and OH lines
N. Kanekar (1), G. I. Langston (2), J. T. Stocke (3), C. L. Carilli, (2), K. L. Menten (4) ((1) National Centre for Radio Astrophysics, India, (2), National Radio Astronomy Observatory, USA, (3) University of Colorado, USA,, (4) Max-Planck-Institut fur Radioastronomie)

TL;DR
This study uses deep radio spectroscopy of HI and OH lines at redshift 0.765 to constrain potential variations in fundamental constants over 6.7 billion years, finding no significant change.
Contribution
First to compare HI and OH lines at this redshift to place tight constraints on fundamental constant evolution.
Findings
No evidence for change in constants at z=0.765
Constraint on alpha variation: (-1.7 ± 1.4) × 10^{-6}
Constraint on mu variation: < 3.6 × 10^{-7}
Abstract
We report deep Green Bank Telescope spectroscopy in the redshifted HI 21cm and OH 18cm lines from the absorption system towards PMN J0134-0931. A comparison between the "satellite" OH 18cm line redshifts, or between the redshifts of the HI 21cm and "main" OH 18cm lines, is sensitive to changes in different combinations of three fundamental constants, the fine structure constant , the proton-electron mass ratio and the proton g-factor . We find that the satellite OH 18cm lines are not perfectly conjugate, with both different line shapes and stronger 1612 MHz absorption than 1720 MHz emission. This implies that the satellite lines of this absorber are not suitable to probe fundamental constant evolution. A comparison between the redshifts of the HI 21cm and OH 18cm lines, via a multi-Gaussian fit, yields the strong constraint $[\Delta F/F] =…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
