Rational Heap Games

TL;DR

This paper investigates a class of two-heap subtraction games with specific move restrictions and outcome equivalences, connecting them to classical games like Nim and Wythoff Nim.

Contribution

It introduces a new family of rational heap games with outcome equivalences and explores their relationships with classical combinatorial games.

Findings

All games have outcomes equivalent to a canonical subtraction game.

The move restrictions lead to outcome-preserving mappings.

Connections to Nim and Wythoff Nim are established.

Abstract

We study variations of classical combinatorial games on two finite heaps of tokens, a.k.a. \emph{subtraction games}. Given non-negative integers $p_1,q_1, p_2,q_2$, where $p_1q_2 > q_1p_2$, $p_1>0$ and $q_2>0$, two players alternate in removing $(m_1,m_2)\ne (0,0)$ tokens from the respective heaps, where the allowed ordered pairs of non-negative integers are given by a certain move set $(m_1,m_2)\in\M$. There is a restriction imposed on the allowed heap sizes $(X, Y)$, they must satisfy $Xq_1\le Yp_1$ and $Yp_2\le Xq_2$. A player who cannot move loses and the other player wins. For a certain restriction of these games, namely where each allowed move option $(m_1,m_2)$ is of the form $(sp_1+tp_2,sq_1+tq_2)$, for some ordered pair of non-negative integers $(s,t)\ne (0,0)$, we show that all games have equivalent outcomes via a certain surjective map to a canonical subtraction game. Other interests in our games are various interactions with classical combinatorial games such as \emph{Nim} and \emph{Wythoff Nim}.