Detection of accretion X-rays from QS Vir: cataclysmic or a lot of hot air?
Marco Matranga, Jeremy J. Drake, Vinay Kashyap, Danny Steeghs

TL;DR
This study detects X-ray eclipses in QS Vir indicating low-rate accretion onto its white dwarf, likely driven by chromospheric flows rather than wind or Roche lobe overflow, suggesting a rare evolutionary phase.
Contribution
First X-ray detection of accretion in QS Vir, revealing a low accretion rate and proposing a novel accretion mechanism involving chromospheric flows.
Findings
X-ray eclipses confirm mass transfer onto white dwarf
Accretion rate is among the lowest for non-magnetic systems
Chromospheric flows may supplement Roche lobe overflow
Abstract
An XMM-Newton observation of the nearby "pre-cataclysmic" short-period (P_orb = 3.62 hr) binary QS Vir (EC 13471-1258) revealed regular narrow X-ray eclipses when the white dwarf passed behind its M2-4 dwarf companion. The X-ray emission provides a clear signature of mass transfer and accretion onto the white dwarf. The low-resolution XMM-Newton EPIC spectra are consistent with a cooling flow model and indicate an accretion rate of Mdot= 1.7\times10^-13M\odot/yr. At 48 pc distant, QS Vir is then the second nearest accreting cataclysmic variable known, with one of the lowest accretion rates found to date for a non-magnetic system. To feed this accretion through a wind would require a wind mass loss rate of Mdot ~ 2 \times 10^-12M\odot/yr if the accretion efficiency is of the order of 10%. Consideration of likely mass loss rates for M dwarfs suggests this is improbably high and pure wind…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
