A framework for the study of symmetric full-correlation Bell-like inequalities
Jean-Daniel Bancal, Cyril Branciard, Nicolas Brunner, Nicolas Gisin,, and Yeong-Cherng Liang

TL;DR
This paper introduces a comprehensive framework for symmetric full-correlation Bell-like inequalities, enabling the derivation of new inequalities and tools for analyzing quantum correlations in multipartite systems.
Contribution
It provides a novel framework for symmetric full-correlation Bell-like inequalities, leading to new Svetlichny, entanglement, and Tsirelson inequalities for multipartite quantum systems.
Findings
Derived new Svetlichny inequalities for arbitrary parties, settings, and outcomes.
Developed two-outcome device-independent entanglement witnesses for genuine n-partite entanglement.
Formulated two-outcome Tsirelson inequalities applicable to various multipartite scenarios.
Abstract
Full-correlation Bell-like inequalities represent an important subclass of Bell-like inequalities that have found applications in both a better understanding of fundamental physics and in quantum information science. Loosely speaking, these are inequalities where only measurement statistics involving all parties play a role. In this paper, we provide a framework for the study of a large family of such inequalities that are symmetrical with respect to arbitrary permutations of the parties. As an illustration of the power of our framework, we derive (i) a new family of Svetlichny inequalities for arbitrary numbers of parties, settings and outcomes, (ii) a new family of two-outcome device-independent entanglement witnesses for genuine n-partite entanglement and (iii) a new family of two-outcome Tsirelson inequalities for arbitrary numbers of parties and settings. We also discuss briefly…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
