Clumped stellar winds in supergiant high-mass X-ray binaries: X-ray variability and photoionization
L. M. Oskinova, A. Feldmeier, P. Kretschmar

TL;DR
This paper models the effects of wind clumping in supergiant high-mass X-ray binaries, revealing how inhomogeneities influence X-ray variability, absorption, and ionization, and highlighting the importance of clumping in interpreting observations.
Contribution
It bridges detailed wind models with phenomenological descriptions in HMXBs, quantifies the impact of clumping on X-ray variability and photoionization, and introduces correction factors for models.
Findings
Wind clumping causes significant X-ray variability up to eight orders of magnitude.
Absorption of X-rays varies strongly with orbital phase due to wind inhomogeneities.
Clumping reduces the photoionization parameter, affecting spectral modeling.
Abstract
The clumping of massive star winds is an established paradigm confirmed by multiple lines of evidence and supported by stellar wind theory. The purpose of this paper is to bridge the gap between detailed models of inhomogeneous stellar winds in single stars and the phenomenological description of donor winds in supergiant high-mass X-ray binaries (HMXBs). We use results from time-dependent hydrodynamical models of the instability in the line-driven wind of a massive supergiant star to derive the time-dependent accretion rate onto a compact object in the Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton approximation. The strong density and velocity fluctuations in the wind result in strong variability of the synthetic X-ray light curves. The model predicts a large scale X-ray variability, up to eight orders of magnitude, on relatively short timescales. The apparent lack of evidence for such strong variability in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
