Estimating stellar mean density through seismic inversions

TL;DR

This paper introduces a new method combining scaling laws and inversion techniques to estimate stellar mean density accurately from seismic data, improving upon traditional methods and accounting for surface effects and mode identification issues.

Contribution

A novel framework for constructing and evaluating kernel-based linear inversions for stellar mean density, demonstrating comparable accuracy to existing methods with improved robustness.

Findings

SOLA and surface correction scaling law achieve ~0.5% accuracy

Methods outperform traditional large frequency separation scaling

Scaling law more sensitive to near-surface effects

Abstract

Determining the mass of stars is crucial both to improving stellar evolution theory and to characterising exoplanetary systems. Asteroseismology offers a promising way to estimate stellar mean density. When combined with accurate radii determinations, such as is expected from GAIA, this yields accurate stellar masses. The main difficulty is finding the best way to extract the mean density from a set of observed frequencies. We seek to establish a new method for estimating stellar mean density, which combines the simplicity of a scaling law while providing the accuracy of an inversion technique. We provide a framework in which to construct and evaluate kernel-based linear inversions which yield directly the mean density of a star. We then describe three different inversion techniques (SOLA and two scaling laws) and apply them to the sun, several test cases and three stars. The SOLA approach and the scaling law based on the surface correcting technique described by Kjeldsen et al. (2008) yield comparable results which can reach an accuracy of 0.5 % and are better than scaling the large frequency separation. The reason for this is that the averaging kernels from the two first methods are comparable in quality and are better than what is obtained with the large frequency separation. It is also shown that scaling the large frequency separation is more sensitive to near-surface effects, but is much less affected by an incorrect mode identification. As a result, one can identify pulsation modes by looking for an l and n assignment which provides the best agreement between the results from the large frequency separation and those from one of the two other methods. Non-linear effects are also discussed as is the effects of mixed modes. In particular, it is shown that mixed modes bring little improvement as a result of their poorly adapted kernels.