The SWELLS survey. III. Disfavouring "heavy" initial mass functions for spiral lens galaxies
Brendon J. Brewer, Aaron A. Dutton, Tommaso Treu, Matthew W. Auger,, Philip J. Marshall, Matteo Barnab\`e, Adam S. Bolton, David C. Koo, L\'eon V., E. Koopmans

TL;DR
This study uses gravitational lensing data from the SWELLS survey to show that a heavy Salpeter initial mass function overestimates stellar mass in spiral galaxies, favoring lighter IMFs like Chabrier.
Contribution
It provides strong empirical evidence against the universality of the Salpeter IMF in spiral lens galaxies by comparing lensing and stellar population synthesis models.
Findings
Salpeter IMF leads to unphysical stellar mass fractions (>1) in low-mass systems.
Lighter IMFs like Chabrier are consistent with observations for sigma(SIE) < 230 km/s.
Results support non-universality of the stellar initial mass function across galaxy types.
Abstract
We present gravitational lens models for 20 strong gravitational lens systems observed as part of the Sloan WFC Edge-on Late-type Lens Survey (SWELLS) project. Fifteen of the lenses are taken from paper I while five are newly discovered systems. The systems are galaxy-galaxy lenses where the foreground deflector has an inclined disc, with a wide range of morphological types, from late-type spiral to lenticular. For each system, we compare the total mass inside the critical curve inferred from gravitational lens modelling to the stellar mass inferred from stellar population synthesis (SPS) models, computing the stellar mass fraction f* = M(SPS)/M(lens). We find that, for the lower mass SWELLS systems, adoption of a Salpeter stellar initial mass function (IMF) leads to estimates of f* that exceed 1. This is unphysical, and provides strong evidence against the Salpeter IMF being valid for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
