Abundance determination from global emission-line SDSS spectra: exploring objects with high N/O ratios
L.S. Pilyugin (MAO, Ukraine), J.M. Vilchez (IAA, Spain), L. Mattsson, (University of Copenhagen, Denmark), T.X. Thuan (University of Virginia)

TL;DR
This study compares different methods for determining oxygen and nitrogen abundances in SDSS galaxy spectra, revealing that the Te method may overestimate N/O ratios in composite nebulae due to physical property variations.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the Te method can underestimate oxygen abundance in composite nebulae, leading to artificially high N/O ratios, and validates the ON and NS calibrations for such spectra.
Findings
Te method underestimates oxygen abundance in composite nebulae.
High N/O ratios from Te method may be artifacts, not real.
ON and NS calibrations provide reliable abundances within 0.2 dex.
Abstract
We have compared the oxygen and nitrogen abundances derived from global emission-line SDSS spectra of galaxies using (1) the Te method and (2) two recent strong line calibrations: the ON and NS calibrations. Using the Te method, anomously high N/O abundances ratios have been found in some SDSS galaxies. To investigate this, we have Monte Carlo simulated the global spectra of composite nebulae by a mix of spectra of individual components, based on spectra of well-studied HII regions in nearby galaxies. We found that the Te method results in an underestimated oxygen abundance (and hence in an overestimated nitrogen-to-oxygen ratio) if HII regions with different physical properties contribute to the global spectrum of composite nebulae. This effect is somewhat similar to the small-scale temperature fluctuations in HII regions discussed by Peimbert. Our work thus suggests that the high…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
