Comparison of RFI Mitigation Strategies for Dispersed Pulse Detection
John Hogden (LANL), Scott Vander Wiel (LANL), Geoffrey C. Bower, (UCB), Sarah Michalak (LANL), Andrew Siemion (UCB), Daniel Werthimer, (UCB)

TL;DR
This paper compares various RFI mitigation techniques for detecting dispersed astronomical pulses, finding that combining Huber filtering with adaptive interference cancellation reduces false positives effectively.
Contribution
It develops and evaluates RFI mitigation methods tailored for dispersed pulse searches, highlighting the effectiveness of combined approaches over individual techniques.
Findings
Huber filtering effectively removes broadband RFI.
Frequency centering best mitigates narrowband RFI.
Combining Huber filtering with adaptive cancellation yields fewer false positives.
Abstract
Impulsive radio-frequency signals from astronomical sources are dispersed by the frequency dependent index of refraction of the interstellar media and so appear as chirped signals when they reach earth. Searches for dispersed impulses have been limited by false detections due to radio frequency interference (RFI) and, in some cases, artifacts of the instrumentation. Many authors have discussed techniques to excise or mitigate RFI in searches for fast transients, but comparisons between different approaches are lacking. This work develops RFI mitigation techniques for use in searches for dispersed pulses, employing data recorded in a "Fly's Eye" mode of the Allen Telescope Array as a test case. We gauge the performance of several RFI mitigation techniques by adding dispersed signals to data containing RFI and comparing false alarm rates at the observed signal-to-noise ratios of the added…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
