Comment on "Design of acoustic devices with isotropic material via conformal transformation" [Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 044101 (2010)]
Andrew N. Norris

TL;DR
This paper critiques a previous work on acoustic device design, highlighting errors in the formulas for density and bulk modulus caused by incorrect assumptions about acoustic impedance.
Contribution
It identifies and clarifies the inaccuracies in the formulas used in the prior study, emphasizing the importance of correct impedance assumptions in conformal transformations.
Findings
Incorrect formulas for density and bulk modulus identified
Highlighting the impact of impedance assumptions on acoustic device design
Clarification of proper conformal transformation application
Abstract
The paper presents incorrect formulas for the density and bulk modulus under a conformal transformation of coordinates. The fault lies with an improper assumption of constant acoustic impedance.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
