Why variable AGB stars with Long Secondary Periods aren't binaries, but are dusty
C. P. Nicholls

TL;DR
This study investigates the cause of Long Secondary Periods in AGB stars, providing evidence against binarity and highlighting the role of dust, but leaves the true cause unresolved.
Contribution
The paper combines velocity and light curve data to challenge the binary hypothesis for LSPs and analyzes infrared observations to characterize dust distribution around these stars.
Findings
Binary model for LSPs is unlikely.
Stars with LSPs are surrounded by significant cool dust.
Dust distribution is nonspherical, not consistent with a disk.
Abstract
Roughly 30% of variable AGB stars show a Long Secondary Period, or LSP. These LSPs have posed something of a problem in recent years and their cause remains a mystery. By combining VLT-derived velocity curves with MACHO and OGLE light curves we were able to examine many properties of these stars and test the theory that LSPs are caused by binarity. We show why we concluded that the binary model for LSPs is unlikely. Examining mid-infrared SAGE observations for stars with LSPs shows that these stars are surrounded by a significant amount of cool dust in a nonspherical distribution, e.g. a disk or clumps. The unlikeliness of binarity in these stars forces us to conclude that the dust is not in a disk. We are left without an acceptable explanation for Long Secondary Periods in AGB stars.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStellar, planetary, and galactic studies · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research · Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
