MOA-2011-BLG-293Lb: A test of pure survey microlensing planet detections
J. C. Yee, Y. Shvartzvald, A. Gal-Yam, I. A. Bond, A. Udalski, S., Kozlowski, C. Han, A. Gould, J. Skowron, D. Suzuki, and the MOA, Collaboration, the OGLE Collaboration, and the MicroFUN Collaboration

TL;DR
This paper reports the first robust detection of a microlensing planet from survey data alone, demonstrating the potential to understand detection thresholds and characterize planets with minimal followup observations.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of MOA-2011-BLG-293Lb, illustrating how survey data alone can detect and characterize planets, informing future survey strategies.
Findings
The planet has a mass ratio q=5.3e-3 and projected separation s=0.548.
Followup data significantly increased detection confidence (Delta chi^2 ~ 5400).
Survey data alone can predict and characterize the planet, albeit with lower significance.
Abstract
Because of the development of large-format, wide-field cameras, microlensing surveys are now able to monitor millions of stars with sufficient cadence to detect planets. These new discoveries will span the full range of significance levels including planetary signals too small to be distinguished from the noise. At present, we do not understand where the threshold is for detecting planets. MOA-2011-BLG-293Lb is the first planet to be published from the new surveys, and it also has substantial followup observations. This planet is robustly detected in survey+followup data (Delta chi^2 ~ 5400). The planet/host mass ratio is q=5.3+/- 0.2*10^{-3}. The best fit projected separation is s=0.548+/- 0.005 Einstein radii. However, due to the s-->s^{-1} degeneracy, projected separations of s^{-1} are only marginally disfavored at Delta chi^2=3. A Bayesian estimate of the host mass gives M_L =…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
