The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Dynamical Masses and Scaling Relations for a Sample of Massive Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect Selected Galaxy Clusters
Crist\'obal Sif\'on, Felipe Menanteau, Matthew Hasselfield, Tobias A., Marriage, John P. Hughes, L. Felipe Barrientos, Jorge Gonz\'alez, Leopoldo, Infante, Graeme E. Addison, Andrew J. Baker, Nick Battaglia, J. Richard Bond,, Devin Crichton, Sudeep Das, Mark J. Devlin

TL;DR
This study provides the first dynamical mass estimates and scaling relations for SZE-selected galaxy clusters, demonstrating low scatter correlations between SZE signals and cluster masses, and analyzing the impact of cluster dynamical states.
Contribution
It introduces dynamical mass measurements for SZE-selected clusters and examines their scaling relations, including the effects of cluster disturbance, which was not previously done.
Findings
SZE estimators correlate with dynamical mass with low intrinsic scatter.
Approximately 50% of clusters are dynamically disturbed.
Disturbed clusters may bias scaling relations, but current data is inconclusive.
Abstract
We present the first dynamical mass estimates and scaling relations for a sample of Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect (SZE) selected galaxy clusters. The sample consists of 16 massive clusters detected with the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) over a 455 sq. deg. area of the southern sky. Deep multi-object spectroscopic observations were taken to secure intermediate-resolution (R~700-800) spectra and redshifts for ~60 member galaxies on average per cluster. The dynamical masses M_200c of the clusters have been calculated using simulation-based scaling relations between velocity dispersion and mass. The sample has a median redshift z=0.50 and a median mass M_200c~12e14 Msun/h70 with a lower limit M_200c~6e14 Msun/h70, consistent with the expectations for the ACT southern sky survey. These masses are compared to the ACT SZE properties of the sample, specifically, the match-filtered central SZE…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
