Rejoinder to "Is Bayes Posterior just Quick and Dirty Confidence?"

TL;DR

This paper provides a response to Fraser's critique of Bayesian posterior methods, clarifying the distinctions and addressing misconceptions about the relationship between Bayesian and frequentist inference.

Contribution

It offers a detailed rebuttal and clarification of the differences between Bayesian posterior and confidence methods, advancing understanding in statistical inference debates.

Findings

Clarifies misconceptions about Bayesian and confidence methods

Highlights the theoretical distinctions between Bayesian and frequentist approaches

Addresses specific critiques raised by Fraser

Abstract

Rejoinder to "Is Bayes Posterior just Quick and Dirty Confidence?" by D. A. S. Fraser [arXiv:1112.5582]