Noise vs computational intractability in dynamics
Mark Braverman, Alexander Grigo, Cristobal Rojas

TL;DR
This paper explores how small amounts of noise can simplify the long-term behavior prediction of complex dynamical systems, transforming intractable problems into computationally manageable ones.
Contribution
It demonstrates that introducing noise into Turing-complete systems can make their long-term statistical properties computable, revealing a trade-off between unpredictability and tractability.
Findings
Noise destroys Turing-completeness in dynamical systems.
Perturbing systems makes their invariant measures computable.
Noise can make long-term statistical behavior predictable.
Abstract
Computation plays a key role in predicting and analyzing natural phenomena. There are two fundamental barriers to our ability to computationally understand the long-term behavior of a dynamical system that describes a natural process. The first one is unaccounted-for errors, which may make the system unpredictable beyond a very limited time horizon. This is especially true for chaotic systems, where a small change in the initial conditions may cause a dramatic shift in the trajectories. The second one is Turing-completeness. By the undecidability of the Halting Problem, the long-term prospects of a system that can simulate a Turing Machine cannot be determined computationally. We investigate the interplay between these two forces -- unaccounted-for errors and Turing-completeness. We show that the introduction of even a small amount of noise into a dynamical system is sufficient to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Cellular Automata and Applications · Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
