A counterexample to conjecture 18.5 in "Geometric Etudes in Combinatorial Mathematics", second edition
Tobias Muller

TL;DR
This paper constructs a counterexample to Gr"unbaum's conjecture regarding transversals in collections of convex sets with the (4,3)-property, and also provides a bound when two disjoint compact sets are present.
Contribution
It provides the first known counterexample to Gr"unbaum's conjecture and establishes a new bound for transversals when two disjoint compact sets exist.
Findings
Counterexample disproves Gr"unbaum's conjecture.
Existence of a transversal of size at most 13 with two disjoint compact sets.
Counterexample challenges assumptions in geometric combinatorics.
Abstract
A collection of sets has the -property if out of every elements of there are that have a point in common. A transversal of a collection of sets is a set that intersects every member of . Gr\"unbaum conjectured that every family of closed, convex sets in the plane with the -property and at least two elements that are compact has a transversal of bounded cardinality. Here we construct a counterexample to his conjecture. On the positive side, we also show that if such a collection contains two {\em disjoint} compacta then there is a transveral of cardinality at most 13.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematics and Applications · History and Theory of Mathematics · Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems
