Inference on Treatment Effects After Selection Amongst High-Dimensional Controls
Alexandre Belloni, Victor Chernozhukov, Christian Hansen

TL;DR
This paper introduces a robust method for inferring treatment effects in high-dimensional settings with many controls, allowing for model misspecification and providing valid confidence intervals.
Contribution
It develops the post-double-selection method for uniform inference on treatment effects, accommodating imperfect control selection in high-dimensional models.
Findings
Method provides valid confidence intervals in high-dimensional models.
Applicable to Lasso and other sparse model selection techniques.
Demonstrated effectiveness through simulations and an application to crime rates.
Abstract
We propose robust methods for inference on the effect of a treatment variable on a scalar outcome in the presence of very many controls. Our setting is a partially linear model with possibly non-Gaussian and heteroscedastic disturbances. Our analysis allows the number of controls to be much larger than the sample size. To make informative inference feasible, we require the model to be approximately sparse; that is, we require that the effect of confounding factors can be controlled for up to a small approximation error by conditioning on a relatively small number of controls whose identities are unknown. The latter condition makes it possible to estimate the treatment effect by selecting approximately the right set of controls. We develop a novel estimation and uniformly valid inference method for the treatment effect in this setting, called the "post-double-selection" method. Our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
