Evolution of opinions on social networks in the presence of competing committed groups
J. Xie, J. Emenheiser, M. Kirby, S. Sreenivasan, B. K. Szymanski and, G. Korniss

TL;DR
This paper studies how competing committed groups influence opinion dynamics in social networks, revealing phase transitions and stability regions through a model applied to various network types.
Contribution
It extends previous work by analyzing the complex interplay of two competing committed groups and characterizes the phase diagram and bifurcation structure in different network models.
Findings
Presence of two stable states or a single stable state depending on group sizes.
Identification of phase transition lines and a critical point in the opinion dynamics.
Scaling laws for switching times near the critical point.
Abstract
Public opinion is often affected by the presence of committed groups of individuals dedicated to competing points of view. Using a model of pairwise social influence, we study how the presence of such groups within social networks affects the outcome and the speed of evolution of the overall opinion on the network. Earlier work indicated that a single committed group within a dense social network can cause the entire network to quickly adopt the group's opinion (in times scaling logarithmically with the network size), so long as the committed group constitutes more than about 10% of the population (with the findings being qualitatively similar for sparse networks as well). Here we study the more general case of opinion evolution when two groups committed to distinct, competing opinions and , and constituting fractions and of the total population respectively, are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
