Indication for the disappearance of reactor electron antineutrinos in the Double Chooz experiment
Y. Abe, C. Aberle, T. Akiri, J. C. dos Anjos, F. Ardellier, A. F., Barbosa, A. Baxter, M. Bergevin, A. Bernstein, T. J. C. Bezerra, L., Bezrukhov, E. Blucher, M. Bongrand, N. S. Bowden, C. Buck, J. Busenitz, A., Cabrera, E. Caden, L. Camilleri, R. Carr, M. Cerrada, P.-J. Chang

TL;DR
The Double Chooz experiment observed a deficit in reactor electron antineutrinos consistent with neutrino oscillations, providing evidence for a non-zero neutrino mixing parameter, through measurements at a nuclear power plant in France.
Contribution
This study provides the first indication of reactor electron antineutrino disappearance consistent with neutrino oscillations using the Double Chooz detector.
Findings
Observed a ratio of 0.944 ± 0.016 (stat) ± 0.040 (syst) in antineutrino events.
Estimated the neutrino mixing parameter 3a0= 0.086 b1 0.041 (stat) b1 0.030 (syst).
Set a 90% confidence level interval for 3a0 between 0.015 and 0.16.
Abstract
The Double Chooz Experiment presents an indication of reactor electron antineutrino disappearance consistent with neutrino oscillations. A ratio of 0.944 0.016 (stat) 0.040 (syst) observed to predicted events was obtained in 101 days of running at the Chooz Nuclear Power Plant in France, with two 4.25 GW reactors. The results were obtained from a single 10 m fiducial volume detector located 1050 m from the two reactor cores. The reactor antineutrino flux prediction used the Bugey4 measurement as an anchor point. The deficit can be interpreted as an indication of a non-zero value of the still unmeasured neutrino mixing parameter \sang. Analyzing both the rate of the prompt positrons and their energy spectrum we find \sang = 0.086 0.041 (stat) 0.030 (syst), or, at 90% CL, 0.015 \sang 0.16.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
