Diffuse versus square-well confining potentials in modelling $A$@C$_{60}$ atoms
V. K. Dolmatov, J. L. King, J. C. Oglesby

TL;DR
This study compares diffuse and square-well potentials in modeling endohedral atoms within C60, finding that photoionization spectra are largely unaffected by the potential's diffuseness or discontinuity, and proposes improved parameter sets.
Contribution
It demonstrates that realistic diffuse potentials yield similar spectra to square-well models and provides optimized parameters for better experimental agreement.
Findings
Photoionization spectra are insensitive to potential diffuseness.
Spectra are unaffected by the potential's discontinuity.
New parameters improve agreement with experimental data.
Abstract
Attention: this version- of the manuscript differs from its previously uploaded version- (arXiv:1112.6158v1) and subsequently published in 2012 J. Phys. B \textbf{45} 105102 only by a removed typo in Eq.(2) of version-; there was the erroneous factor "2" in both terms in the right-hand-side of the Eq.(2) of version-. Now that the typo is removed, Eq.(2) is correct. A perceived advantage for the replacement of a discontinuous square-well pseudo-potential, which is often used by various researchers as an approximation to the actual C cage potential in calculations of endohedral atoms @C, by a more realistic diffuse potential is explored. The photoionization of endohedral H@C and Xe@C is chosen as the case study. The diffuse potential is modelled by a combination of two Woods-Saxon potentials. It is demonstrated that photoionization spectra of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
