On SA, CA, and GA numbers
Geoffrey Caveney, Jean-Louis Nicolas, and Jonathan Sondow

TL;DR
This paper investigates special classes of integers called GA1 and GA2 numbers, exploring their properties, algorithms for computation, and their connection to the Riemann Hypothesis, extending previous work on Gronwall's function and related number classes.
Contribution
It provides new algorithms for identifying GA1 numbers, characterizes GA2 numbers, and establishes their relationship with the Riemann Hypothesis, expanding the understanding of these special number classes.
Findings
Smallest GA1 with >2 prime factors is 183783600
Smallest odd GA1 is 1058462574572984015114271643676625
Existence of large GA2 numbers beyond 5040 is equivalent to RH being false
Abstract
Gronwall's function is defined for by where is the sum of the divisors of . We call an integer a \emph{GA1 number} if is composite and for all prime factors of . We say that is a \emph{GA2 number} if for all multiples of . In arXiv 1110.5078, we used Robin's and Gronwall's theorems on to prove that the Riemann Hypothesis (RH) is true if and only if 4 is the only number that is both GA1 and GA2. Here, we study GA1 numbers and GA2 numbers separately. We compare them with superabundant (SA) and colossally abundant (CA) numbers (first studied by Ramanujan). We give algorithms for computing GA1 numbers; the smallest one with more than two prime factors is 183783600, while the smallest odd one is 1058462574572984015114271643676625. We find nineteen GA2 numbers…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
