Proton strangeness form factors in (4,1) clustering configurations

TL;DR

This paper reexamines proton strangeness form factors within a nonrelativistic quark model, correcting previous results and showing that a small uudsar s component with specific configurations can describe experimental data effectively.

Contribution

It corrects prior findings and demonstrates that a minimal five-quark component with specific configurations explains the empirical form factors.

Findings

Corrected model aligns with empirical form factor signs.

Small probability P_{sar s}=0.025% suffices for data fit.

Including CM motion effects significantly impacts transition current contributions.

Abstract

We reexamine a recent result within a nonrelativistic constituent quark model (NRCQM) which maintains that the uuds\bar s component in the proton has its uuds subsystem in P state, with its \bar s in S state (configuration I). When the result are corrected, contrary to the previous result, we find that all the empirical signs of the form factors data can be described by the lowest-lying uuds\bar s configuration with \bar s in P state that has its uuds subsystem in $S$ state (configuration II). Further, it is also found that the removal of the center-of-mass (CM) motion of the clusters will enhance the contributions of the transition current considerably. We also show that a reasonable description of the existing form factors data can be obtained with a very small probability P_{s\bar s}=0.025% for the uuds\bar s component. We further see that the agreement of our prediction with the data for G_A^s at low-q^2 region can be markedly improved by a small admixture of configuration I. It is also found that by not removing CM motion, P_{s\bar s} would be overestimated by about a factor of four in the case when transition dominates over direct currents. Then, we also study the consequence of a recent estimate reached from analyzing the existing data on quark distributions that P_{s\bar s} lies between 2.4-2.9% which would lead to a large size for the five-quark (5q) system, as well as a small bump in both G^s_E+\eta G^s_M and G^s_E in the region of q^2 =< 0.1 GeV^2.