Interplay between Nitrogen Dopants and Native Point Defects in Graphene
Zhufeng Hou, Xianlong Wang, Takashi Ikeda, Kiyoyuki Terakura, Masaharu, Oshima, Masa-aki Kakimoto, and Seizo Miyata

TL;DR
This study uses density functional theory to explore how nitrogen dopants interact with native point defects in graphene, revealing that defects influence dopant stability and promote their aggregation, with implications for material modification.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the energetic preferences and cooperative effects of nitrogen dopants and native defects in graphene, supported by theoretical calculations and experimental correlation.
Findings
N prefers to substitute near defect sites with larger bond shortening.
Doping becomes exothermic in defective graphene, unlike in defect-free graphene.
Native defects and N dopants attract each other, promoting defect and dopant aggregation.
Abstract
To understand the interaction between nitrogen dopants and native point defects in graphene, we have studied the energetic stability of N-doped graphene with vacancies and Stone-Wales (SW) defect by performing the density functional theory calculations. Our results show that N substitution energetically prefers to occur at the carbon atoms near the defects, especially for those sites with larger bond shortening, indicating that the defect-induced strain plays an important role in the stability of N dopants in defective graphene. In the presence of monovacancy, the most stable position for N dopant is the pyridinelike configuration, while for other point defects studied (SW defect and divacancies) N prefers a site in the pentagonal ring. The effect of native point defects on N dopants is quite strong: While the N doping is endothermic in defect-free graphene, it becomes exothermic for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
