Planck Intermediate Results. I. Further validation of new Planck clusters with XMM-Newton
The Planck Collaboration: N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown, F., Atrio-Barandela, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A. Balbi, A. J. Banday, R. B., Barreiro, J. G. Bartlett, E. Battaner, K. Benabed, J.-P. Bernard, M., Bersanelli, H. B\"ohringer, A. Bonaldi, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill, F. R.

TL;DR
This paper validates new Planck-detected galaxy clusters using XMM-Newton X-ray observations, confirming their nature, redshifts, and properties, and discusses implications for cluster detection and scaling relations.
Contribution
It provides a detailed validation of Planck cluster candidates with X-ray follow-up, confirming their cluster status, redshifts, and analyzing their X-ray and SZ properties, including bias indications.
Findings
Ten of eleven candidates are confirmed as clusters.
Clusters are found at redshifts 0.19 to 0.94.
Most clusters are X-ray underluminous for their mass.
Abstract
We present further results from the ongoing XMM-Newton validation follow-up of Planck cluster candidates, detailing X-ray observations of eleven candidates detected at a signal-to-noise ratio of 4.5<S/N<5.3 in the same 10-month survey maps used in the construction of the Early SZ sample. The sample was selected in order to test internal SZ quality flags, and the pertinence of these flags is discussed in light of the validation results. Ten of the candidates are found to be bona fide clusters lying below the RASS flux limit. Redshift estimates are available for all confirmed systems via X-ray Fe-line spectroscopy. They lie in the redshift range 0.19<z<0.94, demonstrating Planck's capability to detect clusters up to high z. The X-ray properties of the new clusters appear to be similar to previous new detections by Planck at lower z and higher SZ flux: the majority are X-ray underluminous…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
